How an AI-written Book Shows why the Tech 'Terrifies' Creatives

For Christmas I got an intriguing present from a friend - my really own "best-selling" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (excellent title) bears my name and my image on its cover, and it has radiant reviews.

Yet it was completely composed by AI, with a couple of easy triggers about me provided by my good friend Janet.

It's an interesting read, and very funny in parts. But it likewise meanders rather a lot, and is somewhere in between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It mimics my chatty design of writing, but it's also a bit repeated, and really verbose. It might have surpassed Janet's triggers in collating data about me.

Several sentences begin "as a leading technology journalist ..." - cringe - which could have been scraped from an online bio.

There's likewise a mystical, repetitive hallucination in the form of my cat (I have no pets). And there's a metaphor on nearly every page - some more random than others.

There are dozens of business online offering AI-book writing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I called the president Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he told me he had sold around 150,000 customised books, primarily in the US, since rotating from putting together AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller costs ₤ 26. The firm utilizes its own AI tools to generate them, based upon an open source large language design.

I'm not asking you to purchase my book. Actually you can't - only Janet, who produced it, can buy any more copies.

There is presently no barrier to anyone creating one in any person's name, including stars - although Mr Mashiach states there are guardrails around violent content. Each book includes a printed disclaimer mentioning that it is imaginary, created by AI, lespoetesbizarres.free.fr and designed "entirely to bring humour and delight".

Legally, cadizpedia.wikanda.es the copyright comes from the company, however Mr Mashiach stresses that the item is intended as a "personalised gag present", and the books do not get sold further.

He wishes to expand his variety, producing various categories such as sci-fi, and perhaps offering an autobiography service. It's designed to be a light-hearted type of customer AI - selling AI-generated goods to human clients.

It's likewise a bit scary if, like me, you compose for a living. Not least due to the fact that it most likely took less than a minute to produce, and it does, certainly in some parts, sound similar to me.

Musicians, authors, artists and stars worldwide have expressed alarm about their work being used to train AI tools that then churn out similar material based upon it.

"We must be clear, when we are discussing data here, we really suggest human creators' life works," states Ed Newton Rex, founder of Fairly Trained, which campaigns for AI firms to regard developers' rights.

"This is books, this is articles, this is photos. It's works of art. It's records ... The entire point of AI training is to find out how to do something and after that do more like that."

In 2023 a song including AI-generated voices of Canadian singers Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social media before being pulled from streaming platforms because it was not their work and utahsyardsale.com they had actually not consented to it. It didn't stop the track's creator trying to choose it for a Grammy award. And although the artists were fake, it was still wildly popular.

"I do not believe the usage of generative AI for imaginative functions must be prohibited, however I do think that generative AI for these functions that is trained on individuals's work without approval ought to be prohibited," Mr Newton Rex includes. "AI can be extremely effective but let's develop it ethically and relatively."

OpenAI says Chinese rivals utilizing its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes market and damages America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - consisting of the BBC - have actually chosen to obstruct AI designers from trawling their online content for training purposes. Others have chosen to work together - the Financial Times has actually partnered with ChatGPT creator OpenAI for example.

The UK government is thinking about an overhaul of the law that would enable AI designers to use creators' content on the internet to help develop their designs, unless the rights holders pull out.

Ed Newton Rex describes this as "madness".

He explains that AI can make advances in locations like defence, health care and logistics without trawling the work of authors, reporters and artists.

"All of these things work without going and changing copyright law and ruining the livelihoods of the nation's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in the House of Lords, is also strongly versus eliminating copyright law for AI.

"Creative industries are wealth developers, 2.4 million tasks and an entire lot of happiness," states the Baroness, who is also an advisor timeoftheworld.date to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The government is undermining among its best performing markets on the vague promise of growth."

A government spokesperson stated: "No relocation will be made up until we are definitely confident we have a useful plan that delivers each of our goals: increased control for best holders to help them accredit their content, access to high-quality material to train leading AI designs in the UK, and more transparency for right holders from AI designers."

Under the UK government's new AI strategy, a nationwide data library consisting of public information from a large range of sources will also be provided to AI scientists.

In the US the future of federal guidelines to control AI is now up in the air following President Trump's return to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that aimed to increase the security of AI with, to name a few things, companies in the sector needed to share information of the operations of their systems with the US government before they are released.

But this has actually now been reversed by Trump. It remains to be seen what Trump will do instead, but he is said to want the AI sector to deal with less policy.

This comes as a variety of lawsuits against AI firms, and particularly versus OpenAI, shiapedia.1god.org continue in the US. They have actually been gotten by everybody from the New york city Times to authors, music labels, and even a comic.

They claim that the AI companies broke the law when they took their content from the web without their consent, and utilized it to train their systems.

The AI companies argue that their actions fall under "reasonable usage" and are for that reason exempt. There are a variety of aspects which can constitute reasonable usage - it's not a straight-forward meaning. But the AI sector is under increasing scrutiny over how it collects training information and whether it need to be spending for it.

If this wasn't all enough to consider, Chinese AI firm DeepSeek has shaken the sector over the previous week. It became the many downloaded complimentary app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek declares that it established its technology for a portion of the rate of the similarity OpenAI. Its success has actually raised security concerns in the US, and threatens American's current supremacy of the sector.

When it comes to me and a career as an author, I think that at the minute, if I actually want a "bestseller" I'll still have to compose it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the current weak point in generative AI tools for bigger projects. It has lots of mistakes and hallucinations, and it can be rather hard to check out in parts because it's so verbose.

But provided how rapidly the tech is evolving, I'm unsure for how long I can remain confident that my substantially slower human writing and modifying abilities, are better.

Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the most significant developments in global technology, with analysis from BBC correspondents worldwide.

Outside the UK? Sign up here.